Hello all! I am applying to a few Masters of Architecture programs for the Fall of 2021 including: Columbia, Pratt, Parsons. UT of Austin, and University of Washington. I come from a non accredited architectural background (very general on all of building sciences but concentrated on architectural design) and plan on doing the 3 year track at all of these schools. I would love some feedback on my portfolio as it is right now and thoughts on what could be changed or improved.
Positive feedback is loved, but constructive feedback is needed! Thank you all in advance!
pg 13 perspective a bit wonky. maybe do a strict 2 point perspective and line up the horizontal axis with the camera frame? Also your shots are a bit too fish eye. 22 is about the natural eye. So adjust the setting perhaps
pg 15 looks nice. a good rendering it is
pg 21 adjust the photo again in photoshop to make it brighter and with 2pt perspective.
pg 22 same adjustment
pg 24 number label on plan needs to be smaller. the font size ideally should be consistent with your other stuff
pg 26. interior night shot too dark
pg 28. rooflines will be much lighter. all plan must be indicated with a north arrow. plan needs to be labeled with a section cut
Hello all! I am applying to a few Masters of Architecture programs for the Fall of 2021 including: Columbia, Pratt, Parsons. UT of Austin, and University of Washington. I come from a non accredited architectural background (very general on all of building sciences but concentrated on architectural design) and plan on doing the 3 year track at all of these schools. I would love some feedback on my portfolio as it is right now and thoughts on what could be changed or improved.
Positive feedback is loved, but constructive feedback is needed! Thank you all in advance!
Link: https://issuu.com/noahsass/doc...
I think you meant WashU's MArch program?
pg 10 plan can be lineweighted properly
pg 13 perspective a bit wonky. maybe do a strict 2 point perspective and line up the horizontal axis with the camera frame? Also your shots are a bit too fish eye. 22 is about the natural eye. So adjust the setting perhaps
pg 15 looks nice. a good rendering it is
pg 21 adjust the photo again in photoshop to make it brighter and with 2pt perspective.
pg 22 same adjustment
pg 24 number label on plan needs to be smaller. the font size ideally should be consistent with your other stuff
pg 26. interior night shot too dark
pg 28. rooflines will be much lighter. all plan must be indicated with a north arrow. plan needs to be labeled with a section cut
good luck