I come from a university that pushes very analog methods of design (model building, hand drawing, sketching, drafting)
I believe I would enjoy going to a grad program that can give me all the aspects of architectural design that I haven't learned yet. Meaning I want something more digital/fabrication based.
UMich is always ranked and hands down has some of the best graduate programs (great connections, funding, and resources). UPenn is not necessarily seen has having a great architecture program, although it is an ivy league school (great connections, funding, and resources).
I want a school that I will be happy attending, and will teach me a lot of new things.
I'm looking for specific aspects about these schools that separate themselves from each other. For example; UPenn is much more expensive, or UMich may not look as good on a resume as UPenn(I don't know if this is true).
Thank you!
_N8_
Mar 15, 21 5:21 pm
If you don't mind, which one did you end up going to, and why? I am in the same boat
I come from a university that pushes very analog methods of design (model building, hand drawing, sketching, drafting)
I believe I would enjoy going to a grad program that can give me all the aspects of architectural design that I haven't learned yet. Meaning I want something more digital/fabrication based.
UMich is always ranked and hands down has some of the best graduate programs (great connections, funding, and resources). UPenn is not necessarily seen has having a great architecture program, although it is an ivy league school (great connections, funding, and resources).
I want a school that I will be happy attending, and will teach me a lot of new things.
I'm looking for specific aspects about these schools that separate themselves from each other. For example; UPenn is much more expensive, or UMich may not look as good on a resume as UPenn(I don't know if this is true).
Thank you!
If you don't mind, which one did you end up going to, and why? I am in the same boat