Hi, I've just got admissions of masters from two schools - KTH and Aarhus.
I'm from South Korea and would like to work in Scandinavia after graduation.
Here's dilemma for me :
Working in Denmark seems more attractive, since amazing architecture works are happening in the country. But for the reputation of school, KTH is better.
However, Aarhus guarantees a year of working visa and protected architecture license. (there's no architecture license in Sweden...)
Is there any barrier in working in Denmark after graduate from KTH?
Or is it better to get into Aarhus to work in Denmark?
danielkragskov
Apr 8, 18 12:41 pm
From what I hear, Aarhus is at least as good as KTH. The schools are different though in teaching as Aarhus is from the Academy/independent architecture school tradition whereas KTH is from the technical tradition.
Hi, I've just got admissions of masters from two schools - KTH and Aarhus.
I'm from South Korea and would like to work in Scandinavia after graduation.
Here's dilemma for me :
Working in Denmark seems more attractive, since amazing architecture works are happening in the country. But for the reputation of school, KTH is better.
However, Aarhus guarantees a year of working visa and protected architecture license. (there's no architecture license in Sweden...)
Is there any barrier in working in Denmark after graduate from KTH?
Or is it better to get into Aarhus to work in Denmark?
From what I hear, Aarhus is at least as good as KTH. The schools are different though in teaching as Aarhus is from the Academy/independent architecture school tradition whereas KTH is from the technical tradition.