I was wondering if anyone would mind going through the current draft of my M.Arch I application portfolio. I do not have a background in architectural design. Any feedback would be helpful in regards to content, layout, style, length, imagery, et cetera. I will be applying to rather competitive schools so I'd really appreciate some constructive criticism.
This recent edition lacks correct pagination! I apologize, just noticing.
Non Sequitur
Nov 2, 16 12:26 am
Get rid of everything prior to the connection section and 95% of the photographs. Turn what's left into a clean 2-page spread and rethink the type of drawings to include.
You need to show artistic flair and the ability to understand scale, composition, light, form, perspective, etc.
Renzo's Piano
Nov 2, 16 9:47 am
Hey Ford, fuck off.
Sam Apoc
Nov 2, 16 11:02 am
Looks good. One graphic comment: lose the fully justified text for the project titles and table of contents. It works fine for the blocks of text, but does not read well otherwise.
Nice mix of content / different mediums in my opinion. NS seems a little salty...
Non Sequitur
Nov 2, 16 11:21 am
Salty?
Not one bit. Just realistic with a shit-ton worth of experience.
Hey,
I was wondering if anyone would mind going through the current draft of my M.Arch I application portfolio. I do not have a background in architectural design. Any feedback would be helpful in regards to content, layout, style, length, imagery, et cetera. I will be applying to rather competitive schools so I'd really appreciate some constructive criticism.
Thanks a lot!
https://issuu.com/matty_nini/docs/30_page_print_draft_6
This recent edition lacks correct pagination! I apologize, just noticing.
Get rid of everything prior to the connection section and 95% of the photographs. Turn what's left into a clean 2-page spread and rethink the type of drawings to include.
You need to show artistic flair and the ability to understand scale, composition, light, form, perspective, etc.
Hey Ford, fuck off.
Looks good. One graphic comment: lose the fully justified text for the project titles and table of contents. It works fine for the blocks of text, but does not read well otherwise.
Nice mix of content / different mediums in my opinion. NS seems a little salty...
Salty?
Not one bit. Just realistic with a shit-ton worth of experience.