It seems I can’t have a conversation these days without someone invoking the ever-popular saying, “the only constant is change.” As a young professional with friends in a wide cross-section of demanding fields, the truth behind this statement is highly apparent in their various professional lives. All this change has made me wonder whether or not there are exceptions to the new professional rule, and whether or not change has in fact become the “safer” option than digging in and embracing the abstract notion of something “long-term.”
When accepting a job offer in today’s market, research has reflected that most millennials will only stay for about 3-5 years before seeking his/her next big opportunity, move, or adventure. Unlike our parents that might have sat at the same desk in the same chair for the entirety of their careers, millennials’ only modus operandi is to keep seeking, adapting, and subsequently, changing on what seems to be a daily basis. While I accept the fundamental importance of change in all aspects of life as a tool for growth, exploration, and increased perspective, prior to making a large transition in our lives, I believe millennials should challenge themselves to ask the question as to whether or not the change he/she so readily embraces is productive…or simply change for change’s sake.
Millennials’ only modus operandi is to keep seeking, adapting, and subsequently, changing on what seems to be a daily basis. As a victim of wanderlust and an active seeker of new perspectives and experiences, I’ve made many moves that have yielded growth and insight I might not have had had I stayed in a comfortable job or familiar place. With that said, I am now experiencing what seems to be a far greater challenge than moving to China for a summer or packing up my Jeep and moving across the country for an exciting (but vague!) opportunity. What I am now facing is the challenge of becoming rooted and invested in a singular environment and context.
While any architectural office maintains a high dosage of flux in the form of constantly changing projects, clients, and programs, when we start a job in an architecture firm, we are also investing in a specific culture and design approach. As I’ve witnessed people leave one design job for another, I’d like to pose a strange challenge to my contemporaries:
What if rather than changing jobs or companies, you tried to change the system or culture within your existing work environment? I believe millennials should challenge themselves to ask the question as to whether or not the change he/she so readily embraces is productive…or simply change for change’s sake. What if rather than accepting that “new” is “better,” challenge yourself to look at your current processes, projects, and parameters and find a way to eloquently break or change the rules? The opportunity I relate to this challenge would be the chance to recognize that while drastic change might yield exponential growth (in terms of a salary increase, new responsibilities, or simply a new perspective or locale,) investing in your current environment might serve as an accelerator for important aspects of his/her young professional career. For example, by allowing his/herself to feel some sense of “ownership” within a consistent professional environment, he/she might quickly identify new potentials for leadership opportunities, meaningful relationships with life-long mentors, as well as an important chance to become an active voice and member of your local communities (which can eventually spur greater change- whether it be on the civic or national level.)
In a country without a monarchy and a government that changes every four years, we have been taught to view life as something cyclical but ever-changing. America has no Queen Elizabeth to reassure us that despite drastic global change, tea will still be served at 2 on the same plate in the same drawing room. In America, we have always sought change, opportunity, and grass that is neon green. I appreciate this spirit, and the idea that change can be used as vehicle for improvement, evolution, and eventually, transformation. But I also wonder if we need to embrace that change may sometimes be most effective when it is subtle and intentional.
How do we identify opportunities to yield change through a thoughtful investment of time and commitment? In other words, as our generation of millennials “grows up” a little bit, and decides to potentially (just maybe?!) settle down a bit, how do we identify opportunities to yield change through a thoughtful investment of time and commitment? To expand on this point, how do we learn to modify the systems within which we operate when a necessary transition becomes evident, or is it essential for he/she to create/invent a new system in its entirety (including our context and environment?)
I don’t have any answers yet, but welcome any discussion.
4 Comments
Why do we need to compare approaches as if one is superior? The same self-righteous attitude which sees constant change as more brave, more modern, more rebellious is just as annoying when it goes the other way. No, staying put is not The Real Challenge. Each approach is challenging. Changing your workplace for the better is great. Moving on from a workplace you have no interest in changing is also great. Love your work and don't base your satisfaction on the choices of others.
i think there is value in change at the beginning of your career. see what's out there, what kinds of experiences are available to you, so that you can make a decision about what kind of career you want to have.
later on, stability is good. it's good for a resume to show that you can stick to something for a while. but don't just stick to stick. find a situation that you value, that makes you want to become rooted and engaged in a more committed way. that may take 10 yrs of independent/post-college life. so be it!
contrary to the average millennial I feel as if i prefer the sense of stability/commitment to an institution that longer terms employment/engagement brings. the idea of becoming a consultant/1099 is definitely not in my comfort zone. even though it could in short term be more lucrative salary potentially.
one factor is of course institutional memory which i think includes the knowledge or understanding that enables a potential shift as you outline. i know the longer i stay somewhere more i feel i have to make up if/when i start anew. and not just in professional life/community, but civic, spiritual et al
along these lines this old plea/simple suggestion from Gary Snyder has resonated with me since i came across it.
I liked this piece, but when I read:
"What if rather than changing jobs or companies, you tried to change the system or culture within your existing work environment?"
I become pretty cynical that there is a true ability to change an office culture unless you are a principal / owner. I like the question, and welcome the opportunity - but in my experience, if you want to make a change, start your own office or change jobs or locations.
The change of location is more extreme and uprooting becomes more difficult to sustain over time, as does the change of jobs. Another option is to become more fully invested in your neighborhood and surrounding community (via pro bono consulting) as a challenge to yourself to affect the world outside of sitting behind a computer for 8+ hours/day.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.