Given the threat of ongoing lead exposure and the community’s well-founded mistrust of government, should families be offered at least temporary resettlement while upgrades, repairs and enhancements are made to Flint’s badly contaminated water infrastructure?
I ask this fully aware of how unprecedented and complex such a policy would be. After all, some 9,000 young children may have been exposed to contaminated water.
— Washington Post
For more articles on urban health issues like the ongoing crisis in Flint, check out these links:
51 Comments
Personally, I'd prefer a wegmans or Maines over Bezos. Take advantage of exg food networks versus making a new on with a name. Not to mention I'm sure there must be a local bottled water service. Let them "benefit."
Regardless, 100 per person, vs. 150 per household. At a glance, it sounds like a good deal, but add 2 teens. And what about food prep and dish cleaning? And that just killed the local coffee shops, and restaurants.
If it's a private solution, perhaps we should be looking at Budweiser/St. Louis for solutions as well.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.