"In addition to each candidate receiving this public reprimand, their exam scores have been invalidated for any division taken that was found to have violated Category 1 and/or Category 4. Each candidate has had their testing authorization suspended for a period ranging from 5 years to 12 years from their last testing event. Each candidate is required to complete ethics education ranging from 6 to 10 hours within the next 12 months. Candidates found to have violated Category 4 are also not eligible for the NCARB Certificate for a period of no less than 5 years beginning after they receive a valid license."
t a z
Jul 11, 23 9:49 pm
Wonder if Cali will pile on: The candidates’ misconduct has been reported to the appropriate licensing boards. Additional sanctions may be taken at the discretion of individual jurisdictions.
JonathanLivingston
Jul 11, 23 9:52 pm
Looks like they are all Chinese nationals.
The candidates receiving sanctions are:
Hao Wu, of Los Angeles, CA was found to have violated Category 1 and Category 4
Yan Chen, of Arcadia, CA was found to have violated Category 1 and Category 4
Yixin Liu, of Pasadena, CA was found to have violated Category 1 and Category 4
Ou Liu, of Sherman Oaks, CA was found to have violated Category 1 and Category 4
Jiani Zhu, of Sherman Oaks, CA was found to have violated Category 1 and Category 4
Meng Di Zhao, of Hong Kong was found to have violated Category 1
Even when I was in grad school we had foreign students that would cop a new Macbook on a whim or outsource models and renderings, so this doesn't surprise me at all. There is a large culture of buying success that American Universities have willingly accepted for the funds of it.
Glad to see NCARB do something.
b3tadine[sutures]
Jul 11, 23 9:56 pm
Really? You got proof?
natematt
Jul 12, 23 2:58 am
Don’t think anyone should read to much into the optics one way or another… A group of people got caught cheating, that’s it.
Sounds like someone got cold feet in the group chat…
pandahut
Jul 12, 23 12:09 am
.
t a z
Jul 12, 23 8:43 am
Everyone will, I'm sure, recall the last study group that got busted was a group of SOM employees in New York.
Bench
Jul 12, 23 9:57 am
Yeah - despite the comments above, I think these kinds of activities largely stem from what start out as common study groups for the exams, among acquaintances who were already known/friendly to each other, which then takes a wrong turn into the activity that NCARB is reporting here.
Chad Miller
Jul 12, 23 9:59 am
A study group is different than copying exam questions and sharing them with others.
This type of cheating has been done around 2014 ish. A group of people (about 10) wore glasses with cameras to record the exam, then compiled the questions. The idea was that with this number of people they were able to get a good amount of the randomly chosen questions for each exam.
Bench
Jul 12, 23 10:49 am
Chad - not disagreeing. Rather pointing out that something might start with good intentions (ie study groups) that quickly devolve into worse activities (like this)
t a z
Jul 12, 23 1:03 pm
The candidate email NCARB sent on the topic makes mention of trying to sell exam info online but the online press notice does not: About the Case
In late 2022, NCARB was alerted to the potential disclosure of ARE questions on an online platform. An in-depth investigation revealed multiple candidates copied and shared exam questions, a violation of Category 4 of the Policy for the ARE: Exam Candidate Conduct. In addition, some candidates were involved in attempting to sell ARE exam questions through an online platform. All of the candidates being sanctioned accessed copied ARE questions prior to taking at least one ARE division, a violation of Category 1 of the Policy for the ARE: Exam Candidate Conduct.
t a z
Jul 12, 23 1:06 pm
While over sharing exam specifics in an online peer group is certainly wrong, attempting to sell exam info would be an entirely different (much worse) level of misconduct.
Chad Miller
Jul 12, 23 1:55 pm
Bench - very true. Then again I don't see how the people doing the copying, posting, and selling of test questions didn't understand that what they were doing was illegal.
I could see if a study group had one person that showed up and said 'look I found this forum post with old test questions on it' then people in the group looked at them. Other than that I don't have much sympathy for anyone involved.
Non Sequitur
Jul 12, 23 9:25 am
what does suspension of testing authorization mean? They can't retake the test for 12y?
t a z
Jul 12, 23 9:41 am
Yes.
Non Sequitur
Jul 12, 23 10:10 am
thanks. that's quite the stiff wrist slap.
Chad Miller
Jul 12, 23 10:18 am
I wonder what that will do to their AXP / IDP hours? I know your hours will expire after a period of time.
Also once they do pass their exams they can't be a member of NCARB for 5 years or so. In the US that means you're pretty much screwed.
Bench
Jul 12, 23 10:49 am
Only means you can't get reciprocity in other jurisdictions for the 5 years? Your initial license would be valid though?
Chad Miller
Jul 12, 23 1:52 pm
I think so. I'm not sure though.
sameolddoctor
Jul 12, 23 12:49 pm
I actually know one of these guys, very decent person. Not sure why they would get involved in sharing questions with others. My bet is that they did not know it was not kosher.
Chad Miller
Jul 12, 23 1:53 pm
I doubt that. It's clearly told to test takers many times and many ways NOT to share test questions. Besides, this sounds like they were copying and distributing test questions. The only way to do that is with some type of recording device.
sameolddoctor
Jul 12, 23 5:30 pm
Actually you're right. They know 100% what they were doing was wrong but were willfully trying to cheat the system. F em.
Jay1122
Jul 12, 23 1:51 pm
Speaking of NCARB, I just got an email earlier this month about increasing the renewing fee. Asking me to renew now before they increase the fee.
haruki
Jul 12, 23 2:51 pm
The exams aren't even very difficult. Lame that these jive turkeys thought that they needed to cheat to pass.
archanonymous
Jul 12, 23 3:28 pm
Jive turkey is 10/10 insult well done.
Janosh
Jul 12, 23 9:35 pm
Totally. The exams are the easiest and least economically punishing part of the entire process.
Chad Miller
Jul 13, 23 10:24 am
I wouldn't say the exams are easy . . . they're not super hard though. I think I had the most trouble with the PPP in the ARE 4.0. Had to take it twice!
b3tadine[sutures]
Jul 13, 23 6:08 am
Actually, fuck NCARB, I think everyone taking the exam should cheat until the profession changes course.
proto
Jul 13, 23 6:39 am
emotional truth all up in here!
Chad Miller
Jul 13, 23 10:18 am
How should the profession change then? How will cheating on a series of exam cause that change?
b3tadine[sutures]
Jul 13, 23 10:27 am
The same way they've been cheating the profession, and failing the profession. They have zero accountability.
reallynotmyname
Jul 13, 23 12:04 pm
Yes. Stuff like NCARB's insane fees to operate what is basically a simple database of architects' license information. The bloated NCARB staff headcount, and off-mission sideshows like selling CEU's. Also their de-facto control of the state boards.
pandahut
Jul 13, 23 12:23 pm
2014: MICHAEL J ARMSTRONG (CEO) $360,391
2021: MICHAEL J ARMSTRONG (CEO) $500,326
Chad Miller
Jul 13, 23 12:24 pm
I dunno, NCARB and my state licensing board went after someone who 'anonymously' tried to slander me by claiming I was lying about my experience as an architect. I do agree that their fees are high and they should be doing more to make the culture and licensing of the profession more inclusive while also promoting the field of architecture in general.
t a z
Jul 13, 23 3:31 pm
The engineering professions have a similar central testing and record keeping organization, but fees are only applicable when requesting to transmit records to a board. See https://ncees.org/
A classic name and shame expose of a West Coast testing cabal:
Sanctions Issued for ARE Candidate Misconduct | NCARB - National Council of Architectural Registration Boards
Good.
The punishment:
"In addition to each candidate receiving this public reprimand, their exam scores have been invalidated for any division taken that was found to have violated Category 1 and/or Category 4. Each candidate has had their testing authorization suspended for a period ranging from 5 years to 12 years from their last testing event. Each candidate is required to complete ethics education ranging from 6 to 10 hours within the next 12 months. Candidates found to have violated Category 4 are also not eligible for the NCARB Certificate for a period of no less than 5 years beginning after they receive a valid license."
Wonder if Cali will pile on: The candidates’ misconduct has been reported to the appropriate licensing boards. Additional sanctions may be taken at the discretion of individual jurisdictions.
Looks like they are all Chinese nationals.
The candidates receiving sanctions are:
Even when I was in grad school we had foreign students that would cop a new Macbook on a whim or outsource models and renderings, so this doesn't surprise me at all. There is a large culture of buying success that American Universities have willingly accepted for the funds of it.
Glad to see NCARB do something.
Really? You got proof?
Don’t think anyone should read to much into the optics one way or another… A group of people got caught cheating, that’s it.
Sounds like someone got cold feet in the group chat…
.
Everyone will, I'm sure, recall the last study group that got busted was a group of SOM employees in New York.
Yeah - despite the comments above, I think these kinds of activities largely stem from what start out as common study groups for the exams, among acquaintances who were already known/friendly to each other, which then takes a wrong turn into the activity that NCARB is reporting here.
A study group is different than copying exam questions and sharing them with others.
This type of cheating has been done around 2014 ish. A group of people (about 10) wore glasses with cameras to record the exam, then compiled the questions. The idea was that with this number of people they were able to get a good amount of the randomly chosen questions for each exam.
Chad - not disagreeing. Rather pointing out that something might start with good intentions (ie study groups) that quickly devolve into worse activities (like this)
The candidate email NCARB sent on the topic makes mention of trying to sell exam info online but the online press notice does not: About the Case
In late 2022, NCARB was alerted to the potential disclosure of ARE questions on an online platform. An in-depth investigation revealed multiple candidates copied and shared exam questions, a violation of Category 4 of the Policy for the ARE: Exam Candidate Conduct. In addition, some candidates were involved in attempting to sell ARE exam questions through an online platform. All of the candidates being sanctioned accessed copied ARE questions prior to taking at least one ARE division, a violation of Category 1 of the Policy for the ARE: Exam Candidate Conduct.
While over sharing exam specifics in an online peer group is certainly wrong, attempting to sell exam info would be an entirely different (much worse) level of misconduct.
Bench - very true. Then again I don't see how the people doing the copying, posting, and selling of test questions didn't understand that what they were doing was illegal.
I could see if a study group had one person that showed up and said 'look I found this forum post with old test questions on it' then people in the group looked at them. Other than that I don't have much sympathy for anyone involved.
what does suspension of testing authorization mean? They can't retake the test for 12y?
Yes.
thanks. that's quite the stiff wrist slap.
I wonder what that will do to their AXP / IDP hours? I know your hours will expire after a period of time.
Also once they do pass their exams they can't be a member of NCARB for 5 years or so. In the US that means you're pretty much screwed.
Only means you can't get reciprocity in other jurisdictions for the 5 years? Your initial license would be valid though?
I think so. I'm not sure though.
I actually know one of these guys, very decent person. Not sure why they would get involved in sharing questions with others. My bet is that they did not know it was not kosher.
I doubt that. It's clearly told to test takers many times and many ways NOT to share test questions. Besides, this sounds like they were copying and distributing test questions. The only way to do that is with some type of recording device.
Actually you're right. They know 100% what they were doing was wrong but were willfully trying to cheat the system. F em.
Speaking of NCARB, I just got an email earlier this month about increasing the renewing fee. Asking me to renew now before they increase the fee.
The exams aren't even very difficult. Lame that these jive turkeys thought that they needed to cheat to pass.
Jive turkey is 10/10 insult well done.
Totally. The exams are the easiest and least economically punishing part of the entire process.
I wouldn't say the exams are easy . . . they're not super hard though. I think I had the most trouble with the PPP in the ARE 4.0. Had to take it twice!
Actually, fuck NCARB, I think everyone taking the exam should cheat until the profession changes course.
emotional truth all up in here!
How should the profession change then? How will cheating on a series of exam cause that change?
The same way they've been cheating the profession, and failing the profession. They have zero accountability.
Yes. Stuff like NCARB's insane fees to operate what is basically a simple database of architects' license information. The bloated NCARB staff headcount, and off-mission sideshows like selling CEU's. Also their de-facto control of the state boards.
2014: MICHAEL J ARMSTRONG (CEO) $360,391
2021: MICHAEL J ARMSTRONG (CEO) $500,326
I dunno, NCARB and my state licensing board went after someone who 'anonymously' tried to slander me by claiming I was lying about my experience as an architect. I do agree that their fees are high and they should be doing more to make the culture and licensing of the profession more inclusive while also promoting the field of architecture in general.
The engineering professions have a similar central testing and record keeping organization, but fees are only applicable when requesting to transmit records to a board. See https://ncees.org/
.
It's a bit higher for NCARB
https://www.ncarb.org/fees
Enjoy these photos of NCARB at work spending that sweet, sweet fee money: https://www.ncarb.org/blog/pho...
Think about the costs of the hotel rooms, the meeting rooms, meals etc. Plus Vikram's speaking fee and travel.
Newsflash for NCARB: you could do this f*cking conference on Zoom for way less money!
@Chad
Record =/= Record
NCEES Record = NCARB Certificate