1 - has a contract specifying the terms for fraudulent use of his license
2 - engages in said license fraud for 17,500 per year [averaged over 10 years]
is he a criminal fool or a gullible victim? both maybe?
monosierra
Jun 13, 22 10:52 am
Wilful blindness it seems. He is aware that his license would be mis-used but elected to assume that whatever documents his stamp is on would have received his approval had he inspected them anyway.
proto
Jun 13, 22 3:33 pm
2 thoughts
that kind of blatant disregard for license/professionalism suggests that's exactly how he operated when he was active
the architect isn't the only party in the story knowingly flouting the law
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/13/nyregion/architect-license-high-rise-manhattan.html
1 - has a contract specifying the terms for fraudulent use of his license
2 - engages in said license fraud for 17,500 per year [averaged over 10 years]
is he a criminal fool or a gullible victim? both maybe?
Wilful blindness it seems. He is aware that his license would be mis-used but elected to assume that whatever documents his stamp is on would have received his approval had he inspected them anyway.
2 thoughts
that kind of blatant disregard for license/professionalism suggests that's exactly how he operated when he was active
the architect isn't the only party in the story knowingly flouting the law