I got slightly annoyed over EA's prejudiced view about my previous thread which had sincerely good intentions, so I decided to make a genuinely bad one this time.
So, there you go, the possible career paths within architecture:
Talent + hard work > designer
No talent + hard work > technical architect
Talent + no hard work > eternal 3D monkey
No talent + no hard work > archinect user
b3tadine[sutures]
Feb 18, 22 5:07 pm
this should last about...dumb fuckerrry.
randomised
Feb 18, 22 5:09 pm
archi-nerd, aren’t you an archinect user yourself?
SneakyPete
Feb 18, 22 5:22 pm
I love how you try and denigrate folks with technical skills but they're the only one in there with the title of architect. *sad trombone*
Everyday Architect
Feb 18, 22 5:57 pm
LOL, you could have given me a thumbs down over there and moved on with your life. Instead you do this and prove my point that you like to create controversy.
I even admitted in the other thread that I didn't see anything in there (at that point at least) that indicated controversy was your goal. I was cautiously giving you the benefit of the doubt. Lesson learned I guess.
Wood Guy
Feb 18, 22 7:29 pm
I'm a designer and archinect user, so your descriptors cancel each other out. Do I exist?
tduds
Feb 18, 22 7:51 pm
Mission accomplished, this is genuinely bad.
monosierra
Feb 20, 22 9:11 pm
Rapper -----> Architect
,,,,
Feb 20, 22 11:32 pm
Talent for doing derivative work + convincing oneself they are an original thinker is Hard Work > apparently one Designer in particular
No denying the reality of budgetary constraints and a Talent for solving difficult problems + ignoring hacks with inflated egos is Hard Work > Technical Architect
No appreciation of their Talent + No complaining is Hard Work > Eternal 3D Monkey
,,,,
Feb 20, 22 11:58 pm
*Man/woman On a Keyboard*
natematt
Feb 21, 22 3:11 am
I appreciate your qualification of things being hard work rather than just abstractly saying hard work. This field has a bad habit of conflating long hours, poor time management, poor business, quantity over quality, self martyrdom, outright abuse, and quite often idiocy with "hard work".
,,,,
Feb 21, 22 4:45 am
It actually was a response to the OPs
,,,,
Feb 21, 22 4:53 am
over inflated opinion of themselves and their lack of understanding of the realities of the profession.
,,,,
Feb 21, 22 5:35 am
Clarification
Talent for doing derivative work + convincing oneself they are an original thinker is HardWork> apparently one Designer in particular
No denying the reality of budgetary constraints and a Talent for solving difficult problems + ignoring hacks with inflated egos is HardWork>TechnicalArchitect
No appreciation of their Talent+No complaining is HardWork>Eternal3DMan/woman on a keyboard
I thought the original post was as subtle as a freight train.
RJ87
Feb 21, 22 11:11 am
It amuses me that the top of your pyramid is "designer", which is what people who are deemed legally unable to practice the majority of the profession call themselves.
b3tadine[sutures]
Feb 21, 22 12:10 pm
Are we supposed to read those as Boolean expressions? Better yet, it's the commenting on a thread that the OP can no longer comment on, but only read. That, is, french kiss.
I got slightly annoyed over EA's prejudiced view about my previous thread which had sincerely good intentions, so I decided to make a genuinely bad one this time.
So, there you go, the possible career paths within architecture:
Talent + hard work > designer
No talent + hard work > technical architect
Talent + no hard work > eternal 3D monkey
No talent + no hard work > archinect user
this should last about...dumb fuckerrry.
archi-nerd, aren’t you an archinect user yourself?
I love how you try and denigrate folks with technical skills but they're the only one in there with the title of architect. *sad trombone*
LOL, you could have given me a thumbs down over there and moved on with your life. Instead you do this and prove my point that you like to create controversy.
I even admitted in the other thread that I didn't see anything in there (at that point at least) that indicated controversy was your goal. I was cautiously giving you the benefit of the doubt. Lesson learned I guess.
I'm a designer and archinect user, so your descriptors cancel each other out. Do I exist?
Mission accomplished, this is genuinely bad.
Rapper -----> Architect
Talent for doing derivative work + convincing oneself they are an original thinker is Hard Work > apparently one Designer in particular
No denying the reality of budgetary constraints and a Talent for solving difficult problems + ignoring hacks with inflated egos is Hard Work > Technical Architect
No appreciation of their Talent + No complaining is Hard Work > Eternal 3D Monkey
*Man/woman On a Keyboard*
I appreciate your qualification of things being hard work rather than just abstractly saying hard work. This field has a bad habit of conflating long hours, poor time management, poor business, quantity over quality, self martyrdom, outright abuse, and quite often idiocy with "hard work".
It actually was a response to the OPs
over inflated opinion of themselves and their lack of understanding of the realities of the profession.
Clarification
Talent for doing derivative work + convincing oneself they are an original thinker is Hard Work > apparently one Designer in particular
No denying the reality of budgetary constraints and a Talent for solving difficult problems + ignoring hacks with inflated egos is Hard Work > Technical Architect
No appreciation of their Talent + No complaining is Hard Work > Eternal 3D M an/woman on a keyboard
I thought the original post was as subtle as a freight train.
It amuses me that the top of your pyramid is "designer", which is what people who are deemed legally unable to practice the majority of the profession call themselves.
Are we supposed to read those as Boolean expressions? Better yet, it's the commenting on a thread that the OP can no longer comment on, but only read. That, is, french kiss.