Can anyone provide current information on how the masters of architecture (professional degree) at UCLA, USC and UCLA differ from one another? I realize there are similar posts about these two schools, but USC seems to have been in a state of flux over the past few years, so I'm not sure how reliable that old information is.
I have been accepted to both programs with scholarships, so cost of attendance is not an issue. I'm more interested in what people think of the pedagogy, faculty/student relationships, student environment, the work being produced, and post-graduate opportunities.
I would really appreciate input from anyone with recent experience.
Hi all,
Can anyone provide current information on how the masters of architecture (professional degree) at UCLA, USC and UCLA differ from one another? I realize there are similar posts about these two schools, but USC seems to have been in a state of flux over the past few years, so I'm not sure how reliable that old information is.
I have been accepted to both programs with scholarships, so cost of attendance is not an issue. I'm more interested in what people think of the pedagogy, faculty/student relationships, student environment, the work being produced, and post-graduate opportunities.
I would really appreciate input from anyone with recent experience.
Thanks!