If there is a natural gas line easement on your property, does it make more sense to build a bridge over it or to create a fence around it?
Chad Miller
Feb 15, 21 2:38 pm
Hire an architect. Stop looking for free online advice.
randomised
Feb 15, 21 2:56 pm
just cut it with a blowtorch...
Koww
Feb 15, 21 3:53 pm
there’s no easement like quantitative easement
JLC-1
Feb 15, 21 4:00 pm
more sense for what?
t a z
Feb 15, 21 4:07 pm
c) tunnel
citizen
Feb 15, 21 4:27 pm
If Train A leaves Boston heading south at 60 mph and Train B heads north from Miami at 70 mph, how many golfers does it take to change a light bulb?
b3tadine[sutures]
Feb 15, 21 5:44 pm
Gophers?
Everyday Architect
Feb 15, 21 4:38 pm
Both. Build a fence around it, and build a bridge over it. Anything less and you're just making problems for yourself later.
Non Sequitur
Feb 15, 21 4:42 pm
don't forget to spec galvanized skyhooks for that bridge
b3tadine[sutures]
Feb 15, 21 5:42 pm
If you don't have sky hooks, you're just a poser.
citizen
Feb 15, 21 6:08 pm
.
Answer to at least half the questions on the ARE!
Non Sequitur
Feb 15, 21 7:19 pm
Does it come in periwinkle?
Continuum
Feb 15, 21 7:28 pm
Didn't realize how toxic Archinect had become since years ago!
Non Sequitur
Feb 15, 21 7:33 pm
Not toxic at all. Just not into doing other people’s homework. Big difference.
citizen
Feb 15, 21 7:44 pm
Fair enough, Continuum. I'll accept 'toxic' if you'll accept 'lazy.'
Continuum
Feb 15, 21 7:48 pm
I am trying, sir, but can't locate a definitive reasoning to one or the other without more context to the question. Thank you anyway!
citizen
Feb 15, 21 8:15 pm
Okay, I looked at some of your other question threads and see that you sometimes provide a bit of context or show some initial investigation on your part. That's a fair way to ask questions. This thread, however, starts with a wide-open question and no evidence of other effort-- my response was to that.
Now, I just Googled a term in your question and in less than a second the stuff below popped up. Why don't you start in Google instead of Archinect? After you learn a bit, you can bring a more informed question to this place-- you'll get better feedback and less blowback.
midlander
Feb 15, 21 11:29 pm
are architects licensed to design bridges, or fences?
If there is a natural gas line easement on your property, does it make more sense to build a bridge over it or to create a fence around it?
Hire an architect. Stop looking for free online advice.
just cut it with a blowtorch...
there’s no easement like quantitative easement
more sense for what?
c) tunnel
If Train A leaves Boston heading south at 60 mph and Train B heads north from Miami at 70 mph, how many golfers does it take to change a light bulb?
Gophers?
Both. Build a fence around it, and build a bridge over it. Anything less and you're just making problems for yourself later.
don't forget to spec galvanized skyhooks for that bridge
If you don't have sky hooks, you're just a poser.
.
Answer to at least half the questions on the ARE!
Does it come in periwinkle?
Didn't realize how toxic Archinect had become since years ago!
Not toxic at all. Just not into doing other people’s homework. Big difference.
Fair enough, Continuum. I'll accept 'toxic' if you'll accept 'lazy.'
I am trying, sir, but can't locate a definitive reasoning to one or the other without more context to the question. Thank you anyway!
Okay, I looked at some of your other question threads and see that you sometimes provide a bit of context or show some initial investigation on your part. That's a fair way to ask questions. This thread, however, starts with a wide-open question and no evidence of other effort-- my response was to that.
Now, I just Googled a term in your question and in less than a second the stuff below popped up. Why don't you start in Google instead of Archinect? After you learn a bit, you can bring a more informed question to this place-- you'll get better feedback and less blowback.
are architects licensed to design bridges, or fences?
it's a trick question, like the majority of them.