All that's missing is the curly foundation planting.
citizen
May 21, 20 3:29 pm
Any takers?
tduds
May 21, 20 4:36 pm
Reminds me of this, which I put on the backside of "business" cards to hand out at school job fairs.
Non Sequitur
May 21, 20 4:58 pm
tduds, here's one I did many, many years ago:
randomised
May 21, 20 5:38 pm
Whatever you do—logo or no logo–just don't try to make your own logo, seriously don't. Hire a professional if necessary.
Haha Hadude
May 21, 20 7:39 pm
A lot of really great firms only use "only" their name, but it's designed. The typography is custom and IS a logo. Unless you will be changing the font of your firms name on every correspondence.. then it's a brand (logo).
b3tadine[sutures]
May 21, 20 8:16 pm
I hired a pro, never regretted it, my logo is subtle, but sweet.
Chad Miller
May 22, 20 10:01 am
Now I want to see it! Or at least get the name of your pro.
Volunteer
May 22, 20 7:49 am
Somehow I always hear German marching songs when I see this
Chad Miller
May 22, 20 10:01 am
I thought I was the only one that heard that.
Fivescore
May 22, 20 1:34 pm
I think that's part of the reason that version was retired several years ago. The new one is similar, but the eagle is always in a red, black, or white square, the column is shorter, and the font has changed.
Where did you copy that from? Our chapter's executive director gets an email rebuke from the Committee for the Logo's Ongoing Tweakage (CLOT) anytime the chapter slips up and uses old branding.
Wood Guy
May 22, 20 11:17 am
I have a logotype but not a logomark. I've been planning to do some rebranding and will probably include a new logomark, though I don't think it's important for a one-man show like me.
If anyone is on the EntreArchitect Facebook group, they just had a thread on logos--it was interesting to see how many good ones are out there, and how many architects are bad at designing their own (yet still proud of them).
that is the question
Logo.
What are we talking about?
A business graphic logo vs just a name.
I like simple things, but kinda want a logo. Last time I attempted making one I went down an ocd logo rabbit hole and emerged logoless
business name as graphic logo? Change business name if necessary (not really).
Even if it's just type, it should read as a logo. Brand is important. Typology is important.
Yeah, as of now it’s just white
type. My last name is a good name, but ethnic and hard to pronounce for most people.
White type on black
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Logo
NO LOGO is still a logo
and this is not a pipe
for your consideration
I love that scene from American Psycho. Most people probably don't get it... but we do.
One of my favorite movies.
So... I was not going to bring out the big guns... but here we are.
Probably the best logo & name ever in the history of everything.
https://www.dickbuscharchitects.com/
That is unfortunate
Non, you magnificent bastard.
That logo takes balls...
All that's missing is the curly foundation planting.
Any takers?
Reminds me of this, which I put on the backside of "business" cards to hand out at school job fairs.
tduds, here's one I did many, many years ago:
Whatever you do—logo or no logo–just don't try to make your own logo, seriously don't. Hire a professional if necessary.
A lot of really great firms only use "only" their name, but it's designed. The typography is custom and IS a logo. Unless you will be changing the font of your firms name on every correspondence.. then it's a brand (logo).
I hired a pro, never regretted it, my logo is subtle, but sweet.
Now I want to see it! Or at least get the name of your pro.
Somehow I always hear German marching songs when I see this
I thought I was the only one that heard that.
I think that's part of the reason that version was retired several years ago. The new one is similar, but the eagle is always in a red, black, or white square, the column is shorter, and the font has changed.
Where did you copy that from? Our chapter's executive director gets an email rebuke from the Committee for the Logo's Ongoing Tweakage (CLOT) anytime the chapter slips up and uses old branding.
I have a logotype but not a logomark. I've been planning to do some rebranding and will probably include a new logomark, though I don't think it's important for a one-man show like me.
If anyone is on the EntreArchitect Facebook group, they just had a thread on logos--it was interesting to see how many good ones are out there, and how many architects are bad at designing their own (yet still proud of them).