I'm applying to grad programs soon, and trying to decide between a master of landscape architecture and an urban planning degree that offers courses in urban design. I'm more interested in the type of work that landscape architects do, and I think I would enjoy that program more. But I think planning might be a better return on investment. It looks like planners make slightly more on average and have a better job outlook, even though it requires two years of school and no license instead of three years following by three years of interning to get a license for LA.
I'm curious if anyone knows the earning potential of a licensed landscape architect compared to an urban planner, and has any input on whether it's worth it to take on the extra schooling and expense. Thanks!
Hi All,
I'm applying to grad programs soon, and trying to decide between a master of landscape architecture and an urban planning degree that offers courses in urban design. I'm more interested in the type of work that landscape architects do, and I think I would enjoy that program more. But I think planning might be a better return on investment. It looks like planners make slightly more on average and have a better job outlook, even though it requires two years of school and no license instead of three years following by three years of interning to get a license for LA.
I'm curious if anyone knows the earning potential of a licensed landscape architect compared to an urban planner, and has any input on whether it's worth it to take on the extra schooling and expense. Thanks!