Seeing that the list they are publishing includes non-accredited programs in the U.S. (while omitting programs that do well in other U.S. rankings), I think this list should be taken with a grain of salt...
Say what you will about them, but I think these rankings are arbitrary and diminish the unique qualities of the individual programs. Yes, I sound like a mother saying her child is special and unique, but I think architecture programs are no different.
C. Watts
Mar 22, 16 3:08 pm
All you need to read are the comments of that article to get an idea. It's all complete BS.
international_applicant
Mar 22, 16 3:18 pm
It seems to me that it is quite inaccurate that is why i posted it in the first place
Josh Mings
Mar 22, 16 5:25 pm
All rankings should be taken with a grain of salt.
I just came accross this university rankings posted by archdaily. How accurate is this??? http://www.archdaily.com/784261/the-top-100-universities-in-the-world-for-architecture-2016
Seeing that the list they are publishing includes non-accredited programs in the U.S. (while omitting programs that do well in other U.S. rankings), I think this list should be taken with a grain of salt...
Say what you will about them, but I think these rankings are arbitrary and diminish the unique qualities of the individual programs. Yes, I sound like a mother saying her child is special and unique, but I think architecture programs are no different.
All you need to read are the comments of that article to get an idea. It's all complete BS.
It seems to me that it is quite inaccurate that is why i posted it in the first place
All rankings should be taken with a grain of salt.