I am disappointed in Obama including [url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/18/washington/AP-Inauguration-Minister.html]Rick Warren[/ur] in the Inauguration. If his choice was to stimulate debate, I can perhaps give him some leeway, but if this is to display some sign of capitulation to religious conservatives, then I have a problem. I hope it's the former.
I would guess that maybe you make a move like this, then you have legitimacy to go for gay marriage, strengthening the Court against repeal of Roe, etc etc ?
VOTE OBAMA
OK I WILL!
(too bad george bush is still president)
isobamapresident.com
the countdown has begun!
75 days 22 hours 15 minutes 32 seconds
I am disappointed in Obama including [url=http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2008/12/18/washington/AP-Inauguration-Minister.html]Rick Warren[/ur] in the Inauguration. If his choice was to stimulate debate, I can perhaps give him some leeway, but if this is to display some sign of capitulation to religious conservatives, then I have a problem. I hope it's the former.
I would guess that maybe you make a move like this, then you have legitimacy to go for gay marriage, strengthening the Court against repeal of Roe, etc etc ?
that too, but perhaps another thought is by doing this, he is provoking discussion/conflict and keeping the debate in the public sphere?
watch warren go on a diatribe, this ought to be funny, already from his staff i am hearing he is preparing some sic stuff.
Block this user
Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?
Archinect
This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.