Archinect - News2024-12-04T03:50:00-05:00https://archinect.com/news/article/129256230/archinect-s-critical-round-up-of-big-s-two-world-trade-center-design
Archinect's critical round-up of BIG's Two World Trade Center Design Julia Ingalls2015-06-10T16:40:00-04:00>2018-01-30T06:16:04-05:00
<img src="https://archinect.gumlet.io/uploads/tr/trn7xfaxw6q8vwnt.jpg?fit=crop&auto=compress%2Cformat&enlarge=true&w=1200" border="0" /><p>Taken out of its high-profile context, the BIG design for Two World Trade Center initially appears to be a graduate school placeholder: here are the initial seven blocks of program, with a light dusting of foliage on the exposed step-backs. The internet's critical reaction to the renderings released to <a href="http://www.wired.com/2015/06/bjarke-ingels-design-two-world-trade-center/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">WIRED</a> has been heated: it's the <a href="http://archinect.com/news/tag/10116/new-museum" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">New Museum</a> without the ingenuity, it's a brilliant melding of memorial gravitas and client-driven-design, it's nothing but spoon-fed media hype taken to a 1,300 foot extreme. Of course, this is a building that can't be taken out of its context, not only in terms of being a new icon of Manhattan, but also because it is something of a sequel: its unabashed boxiness and new media savvy presentation clashes with <a href="http://archinect.com/fosterandpartners" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Foster + Partners'</a> previous svelte, slanted diamond-topped design. A little more than 24 hours after the renderings were released, we've rounded up the most compelling critical and forum-based reaction:</p><p><img title="" alt="" src="http://cdn.archinect.net/images/514x/ny/nymkbx68um8s730k.jpg"></p><p>In <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/06/two-world-trade-center-news-corp-rupert-murdoch-bjarke-ingels" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Vanity Fair</a>, <strong>Paul Goldberger</strong> confronts the c...</p>