Archinect - News2024-11-23T04:57:48-05:00https://archinect.com/news/article/150435267/aia-commends-finalized-revisions-to-fee-limitations-for-federal-design-and-construction-projects
AIA commends finalized revisions to fee limitations for federal design and construction projects Josh Niland2024-07-01T17:54:00-04:00>2024-07-02T13:35:49-04:00
<img src="https://archinect.gumlet.io/uploads/36/3660d28d86cdbdd6d1184a7ca0b8043d.jpeg?fit=crop&auto=compress%2Cformat&enlarge=true&w=1200" border="0" /><p>The United States Department of Defense has finalized a revision to the fee limitations for federal design projects after a yearslong campaign led by <a href="https://archinect.com/news/tag/2131384/emily-grandstaff-rice" target="_blank">Emily Grandstaff-Rice</a>, <a href="https://archinect.com/news/tag/1887674/dan-hart" target="_blank">Dan Hart</a>, <a href="https://archinect.com/news/tag/299307/elizabeth-richter-chu" target="_blank">Elizabeth Chu Richter</a>, and other senior leadership of the <a href="https://archinect.com/firms/cover/49568164/the-american-institute-of-architects" target="_blank">American Institute of Architects</a>. </p>
<p>Beginning on August 26th, 2024, as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, the statutory fee limit for architecture and engineering services will be increased from six to ten percent of the contract's value. </p>
<p>This is being welcomed as a particularly big win for firms working on smaller contracts. The AIA says: "The increase will also benefit architect and engineering entities with contracts for producing and delivering designs, plans, drawings, and specifications for large horizontal and complex vertical construction projects. While costs have increased for architects, construction costs have increased more dramatically, which results in a higher cost limit."<br></p>
<p>You can review the amend...</p>
https://archinect.com/news/article/150411752/aia-comments-on-congressional-revising-of-fee-limitation-for-federal-design-and-construction-projects
AIA comments on congressional revising of fee limitation for federal design and construction projects Josh Niland2024-01-08T16:50:00-05:00>2024-10-25T04:07:38-04:00
<img src="https://archinect.gumlet.io/uploads/e0/e098d90f00d8cbf76605583056c1adab.jpeg?fit=crop&auto=compress%2Cformat&enlarge=true&w=1200" border="0" /><p>The recent decision by Congress to revise fee limitations on all federal design and construction contracts undertaken with the Department of Defense (DOD) has been commended by the <a href="https://archinect.com/firms/cover/49568164/the-american-institute-of-architects" target="_blank">American Institute of Architects</a> (AIA) following President Joe Biden’s formal signing of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2024.</p>
<p>Under the new federal guidelines, fees are now limited to ten percent of the total estimated construction costs for all architect-engineer services for the preparation of designs, plans, drawings, and specifications. The prevailing <a href="https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/236.606-70-statutory-fee-limitation." target="_blank">statutory limitations</a> had formerly been limited to six percent and applied also to any contract modifications (e.g. redesigns). Any other services are not subject to the limit, according to the current letter of the law.</p>
<p>Speaking to the continued need for change, the AIA’s 2024 President <a href="https://archinect.com/news/tag/1451129/kimberly-dowdell" target="_blank">Kimberly Dowdell</a> said: “This is a step in the right direction to ensuring that architects are adequately compensated for the specialized skills and ...</p>
https://archinect.com/news/article/150398710/uk-academics-decry-arb-s-new-annual-fee-for-architecture-schools
UK academics decry ARB's new annual fee for architecture schools Josh Niland2023-11-13T19:22:00-05:00>2024-10-25T04:07:38-04:00
<img src="https://archinect.gumlet.io/uploads/d0/d044a3041b6f45e5bb5d1a99d5ef0b77.jpeg?fit=crop&auto=compress%2Cformat&enlarge=true&w=1200" border="0" /><p>The British <a href="https://archinect.com/news/tag/1158457/architects-registration-board" target="_blank">Architects Registration Board</a> (ARB) has announced a new £9,200 ($11,300 USD) yearly fee, which will begin being asked from all 60 accredited schools of architecture in the UK next year. The move has sparked criticism that they are “crippling” education efforts in the country’s smaller and underfunded degree programs. </p>
<p>The announcement was made at the beginning of November, just months removed from the organization’s proposal of <a href="https://archinect.com/news/article/150338546/uk-plans-fundamental-overhaul-of-architectural-education-and-training" target="_blank">“fundamental” overhauls</a> to higher education that eventually <a href="https://archinect.com/news/article/150350093/riba-decries-proposed-arb-educational-overhaul" target="_blank">drew criticism</a> from RIBA and academic organizations.</p>
<p>The scheme is reportedly expected to haul in an extra £550,000 (around $675,500 USD) in funds annually. Fees of £3,000 will also be assessed for any new applications for qualification from schools, along with an annual £2,000 renewal fee requiring a “periodic review” of their credential.</p>
<p>The ARB has been hiking fees lately in addition to pursuing those educational reforms, though the latest news still comes as a “shock” to many, accordi...</p>
https://archinect.com/news/article/150022848/herzog-de-meuron-received-reduced-fee-for-tate-modern-extension
Herzog & de Meuron received reduced fee for Tate Modern extension Alexander Walter2017-08-15T14:37:00-04:00>2017-08-15T14:41:38-04:00
<img src="https://archinect.gumlet.io/uploads/13/134pxq5hfqv4tlbe.jpg?fit=crop&auto=compress%2Cformat&enlarge=true&w=1200" border="0" /><em><p>Herzog & de Meuron, the Swiss architecture firm behind the ambitious Tate Modern extension, took a reduced fee for work on the building project after costs went £45m over budget.
According to documents obtained by the Architect’s Journal under the Freedom of Information act, Herzog & de Meuron was asked not to take its full fee for extra work on the 10-storey building, which went from costing £215m in 2012 to £260m in 2015. </p></em><br /><br /><p><em>The Art Newspaper</em> cites the minutes from a 2015 Tate board of trustees meeting: "Conversation at a senior level indicates that [Herzog & de Meuron] will look sympathetically on this position, but that costs have already been incurred to a certain level, which will require some recompense, allowed for in the figures budgeted." </p>
<p>As published minutes reveal, some of the construction firms were also being named for unsatisfactory performance, notably window & facade contractors Seele and Loveld.</p>
https://archinect.com/news/article/104480216/how-much-are-curators-really-paid
How much are curators really paid? Alexander Walter2014-07-18T14:30:00-04:00>2018-01-30T06:16:04-05:00
<img src="https://archinect.gumlet.io/uploads/c4/c44e32df778961ca671cd9c910619b9d?fit=crop&auto=compress%2Cformat&enlarge=true&w=1200" border="0" /><em><p>Many in the art world were staggered by recent reports that the Italian curator Germano Celant is being paid €750,000 to organise a pavilion for the Milan Expo 2015. Celant’s fee, and the incredulity it provoked, raises questions about how much curators are typically paid for organising biennials and large-scale international exhibitions.
The Art Newspaper surveyed around 40 international curators and biennial organisers [...].</p></em><br /><br /><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html><head><meta></head></html>