Archinect - News2024-11-21T13:10:36-05:00https://archinect.com/news/article/126830617/ned-cramer-s-fantastic-fineprint-on-the-art-of-publishing-a-talk-with-the-editor-in-chief-of-architect-for-archinect-sessions-28
Ned Cramer's Fantastic Fineprint on the Art of Publishing: A talk with the editor-in-chief of ARCHITECT for Archinect Sessions #28 Amelia Taylor-Hochberg2015-05-07T20:29:00-04:00>2018-01-30T06:16:04-05:00
<img src="https://archinect.gumlet.io/uploads/vy/vyse1zi3j4ann367.jpg?fit=crop&auto=compress%2Cformat&enlarge=true&w=1200" border="0" /><p>When he was a kid, Ned Cramer, editor in chief of <a href="http://www.architectmagazine.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><em>Architect</em></a>, wanted to be the first architect-pope. After enrolling in architecture school and weighing his papal options, he decided to do neither, focusing instead on writing and publishing for the profession. He's now the brains behind media firm <a href="http://www.hanleywood.com/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Hanley Wood</a>'s Architect Group, serving as group editorial director for <em>Architect</em>, <em>Architectural Lighting</em>, <em>Residential</em> <em>Architect, EcoStructure, EcoHome, EcoBuilding Pulse </em>and <em>MetalMag</em>.</p><p>We spoke with Cramer about his career path and the state of architecture media, and the role of <em>Architect</em> as the AIA's official publication. Cramer and the whole Sessions' crew will be at the AIA National Convention next week; keep an eye (and ear) out for us if you'll be there!</p><p>Listen to episode twenty-eight of <a href="http://archinect.com/sessions" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><strong>Archinect Sessions</strong></a>, "Ned Cramer's Fantastic Fineprint on the Art of Publishing":</p><ul><li><strong>iTunes</strong>: <a href="https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/archinect-sessions/id928222819" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Click here to listen</a>, and click the "Subscribe" button below the logo to automatically download new episodes.</li><li><strong>Apple ...</strong></li></ul>
https://archinect.com/news/article/102190685/archinect-rounds-up-critical-reactions-to-koolhaas-biennale
Archinect rounds up critical reactions to Koolhaas' biennale Amelia Taylor-Hochberg2014-06-19T11:42:00-04:00>2024-01-23T19:16:08-05:00
<img src="https://archinect.gumlet.io/uploads/9v/9vgex3jicofo8lwt.jpeg?fit=crop&auto=compress%2Cformat&enlarge=true&w=1200" border="0" /><p>This year's Venice Biennale of Architecture, curated by Rem Koolhaas, officially opened on June 7, under the theme "Fundamentals". The deluge of criticism and reporting coming out of the Biennale will surely continue until it closes November 23, but so far reactions from the architectural journalism community seem pretty consistent. Critics seem at once relieved that the biennale is not given away to preening and doting upon architectural personalities, but instead focused on "<a href="http://archinect.com/news/article/66227111/rem-koolhaas-announces-fundamentals-to-be-2014-s-venice-biennale-theme" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">architecture, not architects</a>", as per Koolhaas' design. The flip-side of this could be seen as replacing objects of starchitectural value with a too-safe generalism, imbued with the self-importance of Koolhaas' cult of personality. Responses seem largely concerned with interpreting the man at the same time as his Biennale, rather than investigating the interplay of national pavilions' personalities under a unifying theme. But we've got many months to go, and this is only the beginning.</p><p>But with the sheer mass o...</p>
https://archinect.com/news/article/62692155/editor-s-picks-292
Editor's Picks #292 Nam Henderson2012-12-04T11:42:00-05:00>2012-12-07T06:05:23-05:00
<img src="https://archinect.gumlet.io/uploads/4k/4ktxwegbughgqdcx.jpg?fit=crop&auto=compress%2Cformat&enlarge=true&w=1200" border="0" /><em><p>b3tadine[sutures] concurred "i love it. that work of this complexity and beauty is being built in Dallas, let alone the US, is testament to Mayne and Morphosis being one of the premiere firms in the world”. However, some like accesskb argued "beautiful forms and spaces... ugly and cold choice of materials and colours".</p></em><br /><br /><p>
<strong>News</strong><a href="http://archinect.com/news/article/61736558/morphosis-designed-perot-museum-of-nature-and-science-to-open-this-saturday-in-dallas" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><br>
The post announcing the opening of the Perot Museum of Nature and Science, designed by Morphosis Architects and which opened this past Saturday in Dallas, featured some great photos by the photographer Iwan Baan</a>. <strong>Cosmos</strong> commented "<em>Everything about this building is great. Function, construct-ability, massing, circulation, materials, contextual awareness, technology, aesthetics/ design sensibility, etc...</em>” and <strong>b3tadine[sutures] </strong>concurred "<em>i love it. that work of this complexity and beauty is being built in Dallas, let alone the US, is testament to Mayne and Morphosis being one of the premiere firms in the world</em>”.</p>
<p>
<img alt="" src="http://cdn.archinect.net/images/514x303/tl/tl3mnmqiovy34yql.jpg"></p>
<p>
However, some like <strong>accesskb</strong> argued <em>"beautiful forms and spaces... ugly and cold choice of materials and colours</em>". <strong>Thayer-D</strong> also believed “<em>This type of ‘throw it on the wall and see if it sticks’ type of builidng is so common that it makes me wonder why this one should elicit so much commentary...Some of their earlier work was truly sensuous and warm, but this bu...</em></p>
https://archinect.com/news/article/62274079/op-ed-architect-magazine-finally-found-its-voice
Op-Ed: Architect Magazine Finally Found its Voice Keith Zawistowski2012-11-28T03:04:00-05:00>2012-12-03T19:04:29-05:00
<img src="https://archinect.gumlet.io/uploads/qy/qyv7q4qxt9y6ld7n.jpg?fit=crop&auto=compress%2Cformat&enlarge=true&w=1200" border="0" /><p>
I recently received my November Issue of <em>Architect</em> and for the first time since the blogs caused us all to begin devouring images at warp speed and sent print media into a battle for survival, I actually "read" an architecture magazine. It was truly satisfying.</p>
<p>
From its inception, the idea behind <em>Architect</em> was clear; its title was the proof. <em>Architectural Record</em> had lost touch. It had become a glossy product placement catalog, serving its advertisers but increasingly bereft of intellectual rigor. <em>Architect</em> promised to peel back the facade of idealized pre-occupancy images and to share the stories of the people who make architecture: to deliver us process and ideas. The bar was high and so were many of our expectations. Perhaps that is why I have been so underwhelmed as <em>Architect</em> has struggled for nearly 7 years to find a voice. The magazine has taken us on a journey from in-depth interviews of firms producing irrelevant projects, to garnish cartoony graphics that distracted from...</p>