I am trying to compare all of these schools for graduate school, in a M.Arch II program. I was leaning heavily towards VT, however have some concerns about all of the hand drawing and lack of computer student work I have seen even though computer program classes are required in their curriculum. Just wondering any more insight into these programs, I have researched very extensively and really just wanting opinions to help me decide.
UO - Portland campus. Trimesters.
VT - WAAC. Computer Concern. Favorite otherwise.
TAMU - Currently attend for undergrad. Would be cheapest, but concerned about having all the studio professors already.
Clemson - Like the people, have a lot of friends who attend. Good school, but another state school in a small town.
I am trying to compare all of these schools for graduate school, in a M.Arch II program. I was leaning heavily towards VT, however have some concerns about all of the hand drawing and lack of computer student work I have seen even though computer program classes are required in their curriculum. Just wondering any more insight into these programs, I have researched very extensively and really just wanting opinions to help me decide.
UO - Portland campus. Trimesters.
VT - WAAC. Computer Concern. Favorite otherwise.
TAMU - Currently attend for undergrad. Would be cheapest, but concerned about having all the studio professors already.
Clemson - Like the people, have a lot of friends who attend. Good school, but another state school in a small town.
Still waiting to hear back from UMich and Rice