Archinect
anchor

Is Sci-Arc a good school for B.Arch?

hera07

I am utterly confused having read several discouraging things about sci-arc? However, I still feel it is a good school. Can anyone please tell me what it's really like? 

 
Apr 21, 14 9:37 am
citizen

[Isn't the "exclude academia" button supposed to hide these?]

Apr 21, 14 10:54 am  · 
 · 
insomniarch

I went to sci-arc for my undergrad. I would not trade the experience for anything. It is hard...and if you are looking for the "college experience" it really isn't the school for you. The building itself is more of a laboratory than a school with opportunities to get involved in projects and installations ranging from the completely digital to the completely physical. The teachers are dedicated to their craft both within their own firms as well as in academia. The students are driven (as much as any school can be i believe...there are always the hard workers and the slackers wherever you go) But my favorite thing about sci-arc was being pushed to find who I was as a designer.

 

If you want to know anything specific about the program or my time there send me a PM and ill try and shed more light on it.

Apr 21, 14 12:24 pm  · 
 · 
x-jla

Roto is the man!

Apr 21, 14 12:32 pm  · 
 · 
insomniarch

Jla-x Did you have Roto for anything? He was my thesis advisor

Apr 21, 14 3:52 pm  · 
 · 
Veuxx
They repeatedly have very low passing rates for the ARE.

They also repeatedly have very interesting conceptual ideas and projects.
Apr 21, 14 8:14 pm  · 
 · 
insomniarch

Veuxx, comparing pass rates between schools is silly. The ARE tests are nothing like the Bar exam for law or the NCLEX for nursing. The skills learned and studied for the ARE happen on the professional side of things. In my office people are 5 years out of school studying to pass them. it is professional knowledge not design knowledge taught in schools.

 

One can however make an argument about the culture of a school and the paths graduates tend to take. Some schools send people towards the corporate route, others towards the boutique side of architecture. Different strokes | Different folks.

Apr 21, 14 8:37 pm  · 
 · 
Veuxx
I couldn't disagree more with you thinking it is appropriate someone who spent $80,000 isn't equipped to pass architecture exams after 6 years of school.
Apr 22, 14 2:30 pm  · 
 · 
insomniarch

You do not go to school to pass your architecture exams. You go to school to learn the discourse of architecture and design. Yes the ARE's are important to become licensed.... But that is something that can be learned from a book and shouldn't be involved in your design studios. Your three years of required internship for IDP hours are the culmination of your education and are where you pick up the skills and knowledge necessary to approach the ARE's.

 

TL;DR: Schools job is to teach you approach the world critically with a design mind. IDP/internship is to teach you skills needed for ARE

Apr 22, 14 2:56 pm  · 
 · 
gruen
Roto is a rooter.
Apr 22, 14 8:48 pm  · 
 · 

Block this user


Are you sure you want to block this user and hide all related comments throughout the site?

Archinect


This is your first comment on Archinect. Your comment will be visible once approved.

  • ×Search in: