Like Archinect on Facebook.
Sign up to our mailing list.
I'm in a bit of a weird situation.
Stamping hasn't been an issue for me for 6 years, as I've been doing mostly residential work that doesn't require a stamp. So maybe I'm just behind the times.
I am working on a small structure as a consultant to a landscape architect. They are the lead on the project, I'm subcontracted to them, and they are inserting my drawings for the structure into their set, on their title block.
They just asked me for an electronic version of my stamp and signature to affix to their sheet, and that doesn't seem right to me. Is this common practice?
I also have a structural engineer who is subcontracted to me - he has always sent me a sheet pdf with his stamp on it after I sent him a title block to use.
What is common practice in regard to electronic stamping these days? I really should call my E&O provider and ask them, right? Or does everyone just give their stamp to the lead?
Electronic stamps are common, but not acceptable in some locations. Check with your insurance or the building authority.
I understand electronic sheet submittals with stamps is common, but is giving the firm that hired you a copy of your electronic stamp common?
I worked at a firm that indeed had all our consultants electronic stamps on file, that is all I can offer. So it is common to me.
seems strange to me, i can't figure out why it might be necessary. convenient - sure.
but i have another question; in my jurisdiction, according to our architect's practice act, any instruments of service prepared by me MUST be stamped, regardless of whether the permitting agency would require a stamp.
is yours different?
Can you get them to send you their title block, and then you PDF your sheets with your stamp on it, and just send them the completed PDF?
We've never asked for our subs electronic stamps...
Hey Donna - we've done it a couple of ways but in general I've tried to adhere to the following:
If it's just the actual seal (those lovely round things), we do put an electronic copy on our drawings. However, that's only for our own sets - we would never send out a dwg to a consultant (we work with a landscape firm in the same way quite often) with the seal on it. Nor have we ever been asked. Under no circumstances would I ever give someone a digital copy of my signature on the drawing. Nor have we been asked.
I'm personally skittish about sending a pdf with the seal on it - it's not the legally binding instrument in Georgia (the signature is supposed to be there). Main reason is that I'm nervous someone could just forge a signature and get away with falsifying our info in ways we don't want to deal with. However, it's been done for 90% sets, so...
E&O people do not like this practice. At all.
Now, for the truly scary part of all this: we have a consultant who, on another project that we're not involved with, did a set of civil plans for a development that went on hold 3 years ago, after being partially built (and in complete non-compliance with the design or code). The parcel was recently sold and the new owner was told that the plans were 'included' in the price (not true, but less germane). New owner wanted the civil firm to modify the plans to make the work done 'work' for an obscenely low price. They refused. Here's the scary part: I asked the local official during a review for another project what they would do if the owner came to him with a 3 year old set of plans that didn't have an original ink signature (meaning it was clearly a copy, which the owner would legally be able to obtain from the permitting department) - he answered that it happens all the time and they wouldn't think twice about calling the firm to see if, in fact, they had authorized the drawings. I pressed him about what liability would the county be taking on, unknowingly, if something went subsequently wrong and it came out that they issued a permit on drawings that were clearly not approved or issued by the design professional. He became increasingly uncomfortable and tried to end the conversation as quickly as possible, especially after I pressed him about why they were accepting clear copies and how do they attempt to head off potential forgeries.
So... all that to say, I'd be really careful. If you trust the LA firm not to abuse what you're giving them, that's a decision you can make. Personally, I like the satisfaction and finality of signing the original copies myself...
electronic stamps are common out west, esp in the rockies for some reason. i don't know of any other region where it is all that common, but one thing that isn't common is the electronic stamp and signature file leaving the office. i don't think i'd give them a copy of my stamp. request the cad file so you can send them pdfs. don't let your stamp leave the office.
(not that i have a stamp)
tagaloing, that's what I've told them I want to do. But! Greg your excellent (though adding fog to the murkiness of this whole question) post raises the signature question, as Strawbeary did above - I don't know if my current jurisdiction allows electronic signatures. And this firm requested both my file and my signature.
It's totally NOT that I don't trust the firm requesting these things - I do, I've worked with them plenty and trust them completely. It's more a question of principle, as well as a desire to not find myself in a legal situation three or 10 or 30 years from now.
And Stawbeary, respecting you as I do and recalling how you've very creatively and amusingly complained about your old firm's ineptness over the years here, the fact that they had all their consultant's electronic stamps on file is exactly the opposite of comforting! ;-)
Oh, and to el jeffe's question: no, in my jurisdiction if I prepare a drawing that doesn't require a stamp I do not have to stamp it - and IIRC from my liability seminar a few years ago, as long as I don't stamp it the "personally liable" clause can't be invoked against me.
Donna - the trick is the 'trust' factor. My fear with that kind of stuff isn't that the person I'm working with is going to do something sketchy, it's the disgruntled employee 3 desks down.
In the end, the risks someone could forge documents are pretty small, but I'm not in the mood to find out just how small...
This is a fascinating discussion. I've never worked in an office that kept electronic stamps (either our own or consultants') on file so I can't speak to the main question.
However - I just want to add a reminder that it's extremely simple to cut an stamp image out of a pdf copy of a drawing set. So, honestly, if you are stamping drawings and then sending electronic copies of the stamped drawings to anyone, if they actually wanted to it would be an extremely simple matter to just cut your stamp out of the electronic drawing file.
Just goes to say that I'm not sure you'll ever be able to 100% protect yourself from possible fraud.
I know, manta, it would be ridiculously easy - which is why I'm wondering if I'm just being a pain in the ass by saying no to sending them my electronic stamp. Actually I don't even HAVE an electronic stamp, only a wood/rubber one.
And nothing in the coed I just read references whether the signature has to be original or electronic - it just says "legible". So I'm guessing electronic is fine.
How many drawings is it? Are they in the same town as you? Honestly I'd just call the LA PM up and say, "Hey, I understand it would be easier to use an electronic version of my stamp, but I'm simply not comfortable with it and not sure about the E/O implications. Why don't you give me a ring when the set comes back from the printers and I'll come round and stamp them all."
Personally I would not be too keen on letting an electronic version of my stamp out the door. I just... I dunno, I get weirded out about things like that. But I'm a person whose had my credit cards stolen twice (both times without the physical card, just the number) even though I rarely make online purchases...
Yeah, my sheet count is one, my PE's is one. So not really a big deal to come in and stamp/sign it IRL before it goes off to the permit department.
I mean, it's a fricking PITA to GET the stamp in the first place, and carries a lot of liability with its use - so the thought of just emailing copies of it all over town weirds me out, a lot. Though my PE seems to be fine with it.
I kinda wish the state required the physical seal still (some states do), so this whole discussion wouldn't matter.
FOR SALE: ARCHITECT'S STAMPS OF ALL KIND. A+++ QUALITY. A+++ SERVICE. STAMP WILL BE SHIPPED IN DISCREET PACKAGE. ASK US ABOUT A COMBO PACKAGE W/ 3-MONTH SUPPLY OF VIAGRA OR CIALIS.
BE YOUR OWN DREAM ARCHITECT. FOLLOW IN THE FOOT STEEPS OF FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT. EACH STAMP COMES WITH THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTION BOOKS: ARCHITECTURE FOR DUMMIES, SKETCHUP EASY AS 1-2-3.
PLEASE CONTACT US AT UNSCRUPULOUS STAMP-COLLECTING "LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FIRM" TODAY!
I'm going to agree with not sending your stamp and signature to others. As Manta suggested, it would be easy to forge a stamp either way but I would think if someone has your electronic stamp/signature on file it be too easy for them to accidentally add it or assume you intended to stamp something the next time you work together.
If someone cuts your stamp from a pdf, I think it would be a little more clear that you didn't intend to allow them to use it.
why would they ask for just your stamp and sig anyway? are they planning on changing the drawings after you give it to them?
You're right, curtkram, that if someone cuts a stamp of yours off one drawing and puts it on another, that's CLEARLY a violation of the law. It's the accidental placing of it on the wrong sheet or a preliminary sheet that worries me, and sending them a pdf of of the entire sheet with my stamp on it already would be somewhat safer in that respect - I'd have a record of where my stamp went.
toaster I think it's just for convenience. If not, then that's screwed up, and I'm right to be wary!
even if they're not being sheisters I'd be very wary if they're doing any formatting of your drawings - a layer could get turned off, some text might not make it to print, accidents happen. personally I'd want to see the final product first.
When can I pre order the Art Vandelay deluxe stamp kit?
Does it strike anyone else as peculiar that to get a stamp it requires:
5 years of school
3 years of internship
multiple examinations (that few people can pass in one try)
serious E/O insurance
but they allow electronic stamps that could be copied by a 4th grader in 20 seconds?
It is bizarre, jbushkey. But the point is I have a stamp and can use it legally, someone who Grabs and pastes it is using it illegally.
does your city require the signature to be wet for submittal?
Hi, Does anyone have any updates on using the electronic seals? We are reviewing are process in Philadelphia, PA. Your feedback is appreciated.
Call the city and ask them. It's legal most places but some have strange stipulations
Thanks for your reply.
I meant the technicality of using digital signatures to electronically seal drawings not just to the city, but to anyone.
It's legal in Texas. In Oklahoma you used to have to date them by hand and date had to touch seal.
If you mean the adobe signature deal, I've never heard of it myself.
It really depends - on one project I have everything is electronic, on another they wanted signed and sealed hard copies.
It would be very easy to fake how we do it currently. We should probably switch to QR codes that link to a secure website listing our projects . It wouldn't require a significant amount of resources and would be an productive use of our license fees.
has fake stamping been a problem?
Why would anyone but the building department need the drawings to be stamped? We used to wet stamp and sign ONLY the permit sets.
Depends on the jurisdiction - some states require all construction drawings/sketches etc. (even clarifications) to be stamped.
^ Whew. Ridiculous. No end to the stupidity of government.
Certified pdf's? I've done it for change orders and the like, but locally around here we are still wet stamping.
Recently, we have been receiving requests for electronic seals to submit to Townships for permits. With this is the fear of our digital seal getting reproduced and pirated. We have been researching using Certified Documents through Abode/Reader and third party services (Entrust, GlobalSign,OpenTrust, etc.) for creating digital signatures/IDs. The AIA did not have much to offer in terms of a guidline or template to follow.
Our questions are: How have you handled the distribution of electronic seals? Is it a hassle to distribute PDFs with a digital signature, or worth the hassle? How do clients respond?
Is it acceptable to submit an "un-certified" PDF sealed drawing with a watermark stating the specific use of the seal/township, accompanied by a translucent date over the digital seal to identify it's valid dates of use (only usable between 6 month period, ex. 1/1/17-7/7/17)?
I would not call it fake stamping, I would call it unauthorized reuse of drawings without paying for it.
With the certified pdf, it was a few years ago... but I can't remember much. The client introduced me to them since we all officed in different areas of the State and most the 'paper' had to be done electronically. That's actually a good thing I can't remember since it means that it was so inconsequential to make certified pdfs and easy that it didn't leave a strong impression.
Honestly, what is your liability if someone steals it? Something goes wrong, and it will be apparent very rapidly you weren't involved. I've seen those cases doing some litigation expert witness stuff. (don't get me started on engineers, regardless of what kind of engineer, having just "Professional Engineer" (seen mechanical sign structural and variations like that)
The more complex ones I've seen are when the contractor or owner scans your stamped set and starts changing lines... and then things go wrong. Takes longer to clear it up since you did work, but not those changes and how those change played into the defect.