Archinect - News2013-05-25T21:32:30-04:00http://archinect.com/news/article/68932802/the-financial-times-calls-zaha-an-unlikely-pushover-who-doesn-t-play-safe
The Financial Times calls Zaha an "Unlikely ‘pushover’ who doesn’t play safe" Archinect2013-03-06T15:08:00-05:00>2013-03-16T21:35:12-04:00<img src="http://cdn.archinect.net/images/514x/da/dafb2d248f7636dac6adc479a049f0b6.jpg" width="514" height="290" border="0" title="" alt="" /><em><p>Referring to younger staff variously as “kids” or “the children”, Dame Zaha, cloaked in black and with smudges of fuchsia on both her eyes and lips, says she is approachable.
Those who know her (and prefer not to be named) characterise her as volcanic – she blows up but then it’s over. There are no lasting grudges. Her business partner, architect Patrik Schumacher, says the explosions are the byproduct of “uncompromising standards”, suggesting such bust-ups are normal in creative offices.</p></em><br /><br /><p>
<em>She pulls the architect responsible to one side. “I don’t care where [the lights go] as long as they’re not in my presence,” she snaps. Dame Zaha’s two assistants stare at the ground. Moments later they fall to the floor to take off her high-heeled Martin Margiela ankle boots so she can walk five yards across the room.</em></p>
<p>
<em>Why does this globally renowned architect – the first female winner of the Pritzker award (considered the Nobel Prize of the field) – pick on her employees? “Some people take the piss and I don’t like that,” she says. “People have to understand my limits. There is a point of no return. Most people who work with me know that line.” You cannot run a business and be “a complete doormat”.</em></p>http://archinect.com/news/article/29312704/call-for-submissions-conditions-issue-10-gossip
Call for submissions, Conditions Issue #10: GOSSIP Archinect2011-11-30T17:08:12-05:00>2011-12-04T12:31:03-05:00<img src="http://cdn.archinect.net/images/514x/vm/vmgmaoe4md7ptvva.jpg" width="514" height="126" border="0" title="" alt="" /><p>
What is the function of gossip in architecture? Let’s face it, architects don’t openly criticize or debate each others work in public; they prefer to gossip within their chosen networks, aiding social bonding through subtle passive aggression. Gossip has always been around in architecture as one of the oldest ways of sharing, maneuvering and convincing. But how does it manifest itself today within the instant culture of internet and social media? What is the role of gossip in contemporary networking? Has the logic of gossip and instant gratification also penetrated what we used to call architectural critique? How does the world of architecture really work? Why are some more successful than others? Why do some get their projects built and others not? Are they better architects? How important are networks? How do they work? Why don’t the best projects always win the competition? Behind every project, office or architect there is a story that reveals the truth of how it really happen...</p>