Archinect

Harvard GSD M.Arch.I (Lian)

Lectures and exhibitions, life in the trays, happenings around the GSD and beyond.

  • anchor

    Great shame upon our family.

    Lian Chikako Chang Mar 29 '11 18

    Hello Archinect,

    I love my hometown of Edmonton, in Alberta, Canada (a.k.a. Texas of the North), but sometimes I just have to throw my hands up.

    Edmonton is apparently the largest city in North America to not have an architecture school. There are good architects there and a decent art scene, but there just isn't a strong enough design community or general literacy about the built environment to prevent abominations like this:

    image

    But it looks like they're pretty pleased with themselves.

    This building sits on Churchill Square, which is also bordered by Edmonton's City Hall, the main branch of the public library, a theatre (which, with its atrium/greenhouse and flowing terraces, is a wonderful indoor public space) and a major downtown shopping center. The square hosts many of the downtown festivals that take place in the summer. It is by far the most important public space in the city's small downtown.

    The project replaces a late 1960s brutalist building that, admittedly, didn't let enough natural light in and didn't have the most inviting presence on the square. But in no way does that excuse this kind of ignorant and self-indulgent bullshit. The worst thing here is that I'm afraid that, for ordinary people in Edmonton, this project will stand in for what architecture is, and will turn people off from wanting to invest in design or to trust architects at for anything at all for years to come. And who could blame them?

    I am inconsolable.

    Lian

    P.S. Thanks, mom, for sending the news article.

     

     
    • 18 Comments

    • jk3hl
      Mar 29, 11 9:33 am

      maybe they like it?

      Lian Chikako Chang
      Mar 29, 11 10:25 am

      You have a point. There certainly are people in Edmonton who are happy about this building.

      But I'm not ready to say that anything goes. Can we make a comparison with food? I grew up eating McDonald's. And I still enjoy their fries or chicken nuggets once in a while; it's tasty and like many people, I like it. I think it is OK to enjoy it and I certainly wouldn't say that we should forbid this kind of business to operate.

      But if I were a chef or a restaurant owner, this is not the kind of food that I would choose to serve, and I would be embarrassed to claim to be a professional or to be providing some kind of constructive service to society if I did. Food can be delicious, nourishing, inexpensive, and not cause grievous harm to the environment or farm workers, if we so choose. If I were a professional that people trusted to give advice about or sell food, and I convinced people to spend public money on McDonald's food for everyone--say, for a school lunch program--I think that would be near criminal.

      And I think architecture matters just as much as food.


      Lian Chikako Chang
      Mar 29, 11 10:45 am

      (Can I add that the built environment, like food, can connect us with our traditions, with each other, and with the physical pleasures of life, in ways that we're not even always aware of--especially when we think of these things as primarily responding to convenience or taste?)

      jk3hl
      Mar 29, 11 11:25 am

      well put - i'll borrow that analogy now and then, if you don't mind :3

      Lian Chikako Chang
      Mar 29, 11 11:40 am

      By all means! And I'll try to remember that we can't be dictators of taste...

      afrdzak
      Mar 29, 11 11:54 am

      This conversation reminds me of a nice little essay by Marco Frascari, "Architectural Maccheroni." You might enjoy it.

      http://www.inmamaskitchen.com/FOOD_IS_ART/archcook.html

      afrdzak
      Mar 29, 11 11:58 am

      Sorry, the actual title is "Architects, never eat your maccheroni
      without a proper sauce!" Subtitled: "A macaronic meditation on the anti-Cartesian nature of architectural imagination"

      toasteroven
      Mar 29, 11 2:04 pm

      not so much mcdonalds, but more like one of those icecream place where you order the 10lbs of all 31 flavors and it comes in a bucket with sparklers.

      freespace
      Mar 29, 11 5:11 pm

      If his old boss were dead he'd be rolling over in his grave :(

      led signal light
      Mar 29, 11 7:38 pm

      Why don't you be as diligently embarrassed with some of your teachers?


      Lian Chikako Chang
      Mar 29, 11 8:35 pm

      @afrdzak: I heart Marco!

      @led signal light: No comparison! But then again, I heard just now that taste is relative, and we no longer have any grounds for determining what is beautiful.

      will gallowaywill galloway
      Mar 30, 11 12:58 am

      maybe that is why the lecture series on beauty you covered is interesting but feels a bit like a freak show. it felt like the 1990's all over again with lots of pointless points and meaningless meanings. i was kinda waiting for everyone to break out with signs that place a bracketed re

      ( Re- ) !

      in front of everything.

      or spontaneously break into rap on the synaptic cleft.


      it takes a lot of patience to be serious about beauty today after all the fruitless posturing of the not so long ago. but you are right. that edmonton building is very poorly designed and it is much worse than the project by cohen.


      ;-)

      Donna SinkDonna Sink
      Mar 30, 11 9:40 am

      Am I having reading comprehension problems, or does that entire article from the Edmonton Journal talk about a building design award without once mentioning the name of the building designer? The photographer is credited, of course, as ALWAYS, but who designed this building? Seriously, am I missing it?

      Can someone back me up here, because if I'm wrong I'm not going to hit "send" on the new-asshole-ripping email I've composed to the paper's editor.

      Lian Chikako Chang
      Mar 30, 11 9:51 am

      Donna,

      A quick re-read on my part suggests that, indeed, the name of this so-called building designer is not given...

      Send away! :)

      L

      Paul PetruniaPaul Petrunia
      Mar 30, 11 9:59 am

      The architect is LA-based Randall Stout. We reported about this selection back in 2005: http://archinect.com/news/article.php?id=26630_0_24_0_C

      The finalists selected for this commission were Randall Stout, Will Alsop, Zaha Hadid and Arthur Erickson.

      Barf.

      will gallowaywill galloway
      Mar 30, 11 8:13 pm

      hah, hilarious

      poor edmonton.


      stout's own website seems to show a more interesting interior than exterior for the project.


      the rest of his work is similarly populated with poor copies of gehry.

      i guess goes to show that great architects bring out more from their staff than they (the staff i mean) are able to do on their own.

      holz.box
      Mar 31, 11 2:36 am

      barf is right. awful.

      Stephanie
      Apr 4, 11 5:27 pm

      You have no idea how many of my family members and former employers have emailed me links about this building, thinking I would be proud or something.

      for shame Edmonton... for shame...

    • Back to Entry List...
  • ×Search in:
 

About this Blog

Lectures and exhibitions, life in the trays, happenings around Cambridge...and once in a while, some studio and course work. Please note that all live blogs are abridged and approximate. If you want to see exactly what happened, in most cases a video of the event is posted online by the event's hosts. If you have concerns about how you are quoted, please contact me via Archinect's email.

Affiliated with:

Authored by:

  • Lian Chikako Chang

Other blogs affiliated with Harvard University:

Recent Entries


Please wait... loading
Please wait... loading